Export limit exceeded: 55516 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (55516 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-2103 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Inclusion of undocumented features vulnerability accessible when logged on with a privileged access level on the following Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories relays could allow the relay to behave unpredictably: SEL-700BT Motor Bus Transfer Relay, SEL-700G Generator Protection Relay, SEL-710-5 Motor Protection Relay, SEL-751 Feeder Protection Relay, SEL-787-2/-3/-4 Transformer Protection Relay, SEL-787Z High-Impedance Differential Relay . See product instruction manual appendix A dated 20240308 for more details regarding the SEL-751 Feeder Protection Relay. For more information for the other affected products, see their instruction manuals dated 20240329. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21783 | 2026-04-15 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| Integer overflow for some Intel(R) VPL software before version 24.1.4 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21844 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Integer overflow in firmware for some Intel(R) CSME may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21853 | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| Improper finite state machines (FSMs) in the hardware logic in some 4th and 5th Generation Intel(R) Xeon(R) Processors may allow an authorized user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21859 | 1 Intel | 1 Processors | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Improper buffer restrictions in the UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2193 | 2 Amd, Xen | 2 Cpu, Xen | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| A Speculative Race Condition (SRC) vulnerability that impacts modern CPU architectures supporting speculative execution (related to Spectre V1) has been disclosed. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to disclose arbitrary data from the CPU using race conditions to access the speculative executable code paths. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21947 | 1 Amd | 8 Athlon, Athlon 3000, Ryzen and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in the system management mode (SMM) could allow a privileged attacker to overwrite arbitrary memory potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution at the SMM level. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21971 | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| Improper input validation in AMD Crash Defender could allow an attacker to provide the Windows® system process ID to a kernel-mode driver, resulting in an operating system crash, potentially leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2201 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium |
| A cross-privilege Spectre v2 vulnerability allows attackers to bypass all deployed mitigations, including the recent Fine(IBT), and to leak arbitrary Linux kernel memory on Intel systems. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2129 | 2026-04-15 | 5.6 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Mage AI 0.9.75. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to insecure default initialization of resource. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. After 7 months of repeated follow-ups by the researcher, Mage AI has decided to not accept this issue as a valid security vulnerability and has confirmed that they will not be addressing it. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22040 | 1 Siemens | 14 Cerberus Pro En Engineering Tool, Cerberus Pro En Fire Panel Fc72x, Cerberus Pro En X200 Cloud Distribution and 11 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Cerberus PRO EN Engineering Tool (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP6 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP7 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP8 (All versions < IP8 SR4), Cerberus PRO EN X200 Cloud Distribution IP7 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN X200 Cloud Distribution IP8 (All versions < V4.3.5618), Cerberus PRO EN X300 Cloud Distribution IP7 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN X300 Cloud Distribution IP8 (All versions < V4.3.5617), Cerberus PRO UL Compact Panel FC922/924 (All versions < MP4), Cerberus PRO UL Engineering Tool (All versions < MP4), Cerberus PRO UL X300 Cloud Distribution (All versions < V4.3.0001), Desigo Fire Safety UL Compact Panel FC2025/2050 (All versions < MP4), Desigo Fire Safety UL Engineering Tool (All versions < MP4), Desigo Fire Safety UL X300 Cloud Distribution (All versions < V4.3.0001), Sinteso FS20 EN Engineering Tool (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN Fire Panel FC20 MP6 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN Fire Panel FC20 MP7 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN Fire Panel FC20 MP8 (All versions < MP8 SR4), Sinteso FS20 EN X200 Cloud Distribution MP7 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN X200 Cloud Distribution MP8 (All versions < V4.3.5618), Sinteso FS20 EN X300 Cloud Distribution MP7 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN X300 Cloud Distribution MP8 (All versions < V4.3.5617), Sinteso Mobile (All versions). The network communication library in affected systems insufficiently validates HMAC values which might result in a buffer overread. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the network service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22041 | 1 Siemens | 13 Cerberus Pro En Engineering Tool, Cerberus Pro En Fire Panel Fc72x, Cerberus Pro En X200 Cloud Distribution and 10 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Cerberus PRO EN Engineering Tool (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP6 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP7 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP8 (All versions < IP8 SR4), Cerberus PRO EN X200 Cloud Distribution IP7 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN X200 Cloud Distribution IP8 (All versions < V4.3.5618), Cerberus PRO EN X300 Cloud Distribution IP7 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN X300 Cloud Distribution IP8 (All versions < V4.3.5617), Cerberus PRO UL Compact Panel FC922/924 (All versions < MP4), Cerberus PRO UL Engineering Tool (All versions < MP4), Cerberus PRO UL X300 Cloud Distribution (All versions < V4.3.0001), Desigo Fire Safety UL Compact Panel FC2025/2050 (All versions < MP4), Desigo Fire Safety UL Engineering Tool (All versions < MP4), Desigo Fire Safety UL X300 Cloud Distribution (All versions < V4.3.0001), Sinteso FS20 EN Engineering Tool (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN Fire Panel FC20 MP6 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN Fire Panel FC20 MP7 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN Fire Panel FC20 MP8 (All versions < MP8 SR4), Sinteso FS20 EN X200 Cloud Distribution MP7 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN X200 Cloud Distribution MP8 (All versions < V4.3.5618), Sinteso FS20 EN X300 Cloud Distribution MP7 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN X300 Cloud Distribution MP8 (All versions < V4.3.5617), Sinteso Mobile (All versions). The network communication library in affected systems improperly handles memory buffers when parsing X.509 certificates. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the network service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23485 | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 Medium | ||
| Improperly Preserved Integrity of Hardware Configuration State During a Power Save/Restore Operation (CWE-1304) in the Controller 6000 and 7000 can lead to secured door locks connected via Aperio Communication Hubs to momentarily allow free access. This issue affects: Gallagher Controller 6000 and 7000 9.10 prior to vCR9.10.240520a (distributed in 9.10.1268(MR1)), 9.00 prior to vCR9.00.240521a (distributed in 9.00.1990(MR3)), 8.90 prior to vCR8.90.240520a (distributed in 8.90.1947 (MR4)), 8.80 prior to vCR8.80.240520a (distributed in 8.80.1726 (MR5)), 8.70 prior to vCR8.70.240520a (distributed in 8.70.2824 (MR7)), all versions of 8.60 and prior. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23593 | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was reported in a system recovery bootloader that was part of the Lenovo preloaded Windows 7 and 8 operating systems from 2012 to 2014 that could allow a privileged attacker with local access to modify the boot manager and escalate privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25115 | 2026-04-15 | 7 High | ||
| RedisBloom adds a set of probabilistic data structures to Redis. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.4.7 and 2.6.10, specially crafted `CF.LOADCHUNK` commands may be used by authenticated users to perform heap overflow, which may lead to remote code execution. The problem is fixed in RedisBloom 2.4.7 and 2.6.10. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25137 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| In AutomationDirect C-MORE EA9 HMI there is a program that copies a buffer of a size controlled by the user into a limited sized buffer on the stack which may lead to a stack overflow. The result of this stack-based buffer overflow can lead to denial-of-service conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25253 | 1 Iobit | 1 Driver Booster | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Driver Booster v10.6 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the Host parameter under the Customize proxy module. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25262 | 1 Tug | 1 Tex Live | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| texlive-bin commit c515e was discovered to contain heap buffer overflow via the function ttfLoadHDMX:ttfdump. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted TTF file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25331 | 2026-04-15 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| DIR-822 Rev. B Firmware v2.02KRB09 and DIR-822-CA Rev. B Firmware v2.03WWb01 suffer from a LAN-Side Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability elevated from HNAP Stack-Based Buffer Overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2119 | 2026-04-15 | 2 Low | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Thinkware Car Dashcam F800 Pro up to 20250226. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Device Registration Handler. The manipulation leads to use of default credentials. It is possible to launch the attack on the physical device. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||