Export limit exceeded: 55520 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (55520 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-32366 | 1 Connman | 1 Connman | 2026-04-15 | 4.8 Medium |
| In ConnMan through 1.44, parse_rr in dnsproxy.c has a memcpy length that depends on an RR RDLENGTH value, i.e., *rdlen=ntohs(rr->rdlen) and memcpy(response+offset,*end,*rdlen) without a check for whether the sum of *end and *rdlen exceeds max. Consequently, *rdlen may be larger than the amount of remaining packet data in the current state of parsing. Values of stack memory locations may be sent over the network in a response. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37213 | 1 Digitalvolcano Software | 1 Textcrawler Pro | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| TextCrawler Pro 3.1.1 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to crash the application by sending an oversized buffer in the license key field. Attackers can generate a 6000-byte payload and paste it into the activation field to trigger an application crash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32412 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Fuji Electric Smart Editor is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37215 | 2 Password-solutions, Top Password Software | 2 Office Password Recovery, Msn Password Recovery | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| MSN Password Recovery version 1.30 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to crash the application by supplying an oversized input in the registration code field. Attackers can generate a 9000-byte buffer of repeated characters and paste it into the 'User Name and Registration Code' field to trigger an application crash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32461 | 1 Tiki | 1 Tiki | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| wikiplugin_includetpl in lib/wiki-plugins/wikiplugin_includetpl.php in Tiki before 28.3 mishandles input to an eval. The fixed versions are 21.12, 24.8, 27.2, and 28.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32471 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| The device’s passwords have not been adequately salted, making them vulnerable to password extraction attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34164 | 2 Netsupport, Netsupportsoftware | 3 Netsupport Manager Agent, Netsupport Manager Client, Netsupport Manager | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in NetSupport Manager 14.x versions prior to 14.12.0000 allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) or execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34165 | 2 Netsupport, Netsupportsoftware | 3 Netsupport Manager Agent, Netsupport Manager Client, Netsupport Manager | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in NetSupport Manager 14.x versions prior to 14.12.0000 allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) or potentially leak a limited amount of memory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34300 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A template injection vulnerability exists in Sawtooth Software’s Lighthouse Studio versions prior to 9.16.14 via the ciwweb.pl http://ciwweb.pl/ Perl web application. Exploitation allows an unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary commands. | ||||
| CVE-2025-35998 | 1 Intel | 1 Intel Platforms | 2026-04-15 | 7.9 High |
| Missing protection mechanism for alternate hardware interface in the Intel(R) Quick Assist Technology for some Intel(R) Platforms within Ring 0: Kernel may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3621 | 2026-04-15 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities* in ActADUR local server product, developed and maintained by ProTNS, allows Remote Code Inclusion on host systems. * vulnerabilities: * Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') * Use of Hard-coded Credentials * Improper Authentication * Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address The vulnerability has been rated as critical.This issue affects ActADUR: from v2.0.1.9 before v2.0.2.0., hence updating to version v2.0.2.0. or above is required. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3648 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in the Now Platform that could result in data being inferred without authorization. Under certain conditional access control list (ACL) configurations, this vulnerability could enable unauthenticated and authenticated users to use range query requests to infer instance data that is not intended to be accessible to them. To assist customers in enhancing access controls, ServiceNow has introduced additional access control frameworks in Xanadu and Yokohama, such as Query ACLs, Security Data Filters and Deny-Unless ACLs. Additionally, in May 2025, ServiceNow delivered to customers a security update that is designed to enhance customer ACL configurations. Customers, please review the KB Articles in the References section. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36521 | 1 Microdicom | 1 Dicom Viewer | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| MicroDicom DICOM Viewer is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read which may allow an attacker to cause memory corruption within the application. The user must open a malicious DCM file for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36553 | 2 Broadcom, Dell | 2 Bcm5820x, Controlvault3 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the CvManager functionality of Dell ControlVault3 prior to 5.15.14.19 and Dell ControlVault3 Plus prior to 6.2.36.47. A specially crafted ControlVault API call can lead to memory corruption. An attacker can issue an api call to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36625 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Nessus versions prior to 10.8.4, a non-authenticated attacker could alter Nessus logging entries by manipulating http requests to the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36730 | 1 Windsurf | 1 Windsurf | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A prompt injection vulnerability exists in Windsurft version 1.10.7 in Write mode using SWE-1 model. It is possible to create a file name that will be appended to the user prompt causing Windsurf to follow its instructions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3854 | 2026-04-15 | 8 High | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in H3C GR-3000AX up to V100R006. Affected is the function EnableIpv6/UpdateWanModeMulti/UpdateIpv6Params/EditWlanMacList/Edit_List_SSID of the file /goform/aspForm of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument param leads to buffer overflow. The attack needs to be initiated within the local network. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. Other functions might be affected as well. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40246 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: fix out of bounds memory read error in symlink repair xfs/286 produced this report on my test fleet: ================================================================== BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds read in memcpy_orig+0x54/0x110 Out-of-bounds read at 0xffff88843fe9e038 (184B right of kfence-#184): memcpy_orig+0x54/0x110 xrep_symlink_salvage_inline+0xb3/0xf0 [xfs] xrep_symlink_salvage+0x100/0x110 [xfs] xrep_symlink+0x2e/0x80 [xfs] xrep_attempt+0x61/0x1f0 [xfs] xfs_scrub_metadata+0x34f/0x5c0 [xfs] xfs_ioc_scrubv_metadata+0x387/0x560 [xfs] xfs_file_ioctl+0xe23/0x10e0 [xfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x76/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x1e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 kfence-#184: 0xffff88843fe9df80-0xffff88843fe9dfea, size=107, cache=kmalloc-128 allocated by task 3470 on cpu 1 at 263329.131592s (192823.508886s ago): xfs_init_local_fork+0x79/0xe0 [xfs] xfs_iformat_local+0xa4/0x170 [xfs] xfs_iformat_data_fork+0x148/0x180 [xfs] xfs_inode_from_disk+0x2cd/0x480 [xfs] xfs_iget+0x450/0xd60 [xfs] xfs_bulkstat_one_int+0x6b/0x510 [xfs] xfs_bulkstat_iwalk+0x1e/0x30 [xfs] xfs_iwalk_ag_recs+0xdf/0x150 [xfs] xfs_iwalk_run_callbacks+0xb9/0x190 [xfs] xfs_iwalk_ag+0x1dc/0x2f0 [xfs] xfs_iwalk_args.constprop.0+0x6a/0x120 [xfs] xfs_iwalk+0xa4/0xd0 [xfs] xfs_bulkstat+0xfa/0x170 [xfs] xfs_ioc_fsbulkstat.isra.0+0x13a/0x230 [xfs] xfs_file_ioctl+0xbf2/0x10e0 [xfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x76/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x1e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1300113 Comm: xfs_scrub Not tainted 6.18.0-rc4-djwx #rc4 PREEMPT(lazy) 3d744dd94e92690f00a04398d2bd8631dcef1954 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-4.module+el8.8.0+21164+ed375313 04/01/2014 ================================================================== On further analysis, I realized that the second parameter to min() is not correct. xfs_ifork::if_bytes is the size of the xfs_ifork::if_data buffer. if_bytes can be smaller than the data fork size because: (a) the forkoff code tries to keep the data area as large as possible (b) for symbolic links, if_bytes is the ondisk file size + 1 (c) forkoff is always a multiple of 8. Case in point: for a single-byte symlink target, forkoff will be 8 but the buffer will only be 2 bytes long. In other words, the logic here is wrong and we walk off the end of the incore buffer. Fix that. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42909 | 1 Sap | 1 Cloud Appliance Library Appliances | 2026-04-15 | 3 Low |
| SAP Cloud Appliance Library Appliances allows an attacker with high privileges to leverage an insecure S/4HANA default profile setting in an existing SAP CAL appliances to gain access to other appliances. This has low impact on confidentiality of the application, integrity and availability is not impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42916 | 1 Sap | 1 S/4hana | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Due to missing input validation, an attacker with high privilege access to ABAP reports could delete the content of arbitrary database tables, if the tables are not protected by an authorization group. This leads to a high impact on integrity and availability of the database but no impact on confidentiality. | ||||