Export limit exceeded: 424397 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 30155 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (30155 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-2374 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An exploitable memory corruption vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT MultiMX message sent via the server can result in an out-of-bounds write leading to memory disclosure and code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2380 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent to the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A user could be convinced to enter a particular string which would then get converted incorrectly and could lead to a potential out-of-bounds read. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10371 | 1 Libtiff | 1 Libtiff | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The TIFFWriteDirectoryTagCheckedRational function in tif_dirwrite.c in LibTIFF 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and application exit) via a crafted TIFF file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8147 | 1 Huawei | 46 Ac6005, Ac6005 Firmware, Ac6605 and 43 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| AC6005 V200R006C10SPC200,AC6605 V200R006C10SPC200,AR1200 with software V200R005C10CP0582T, V200R005C10HP0581T, V200R005C20SPC026T,AR200 with software V200R005C20SPC026T,AR3200 V200R005C20SPC026T,CloudEngine 12800 with software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 5800 with software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 6800 with software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 7800 with software V100R003C00, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00,CloudEngine 8800 with software V100R006C00, V200R001C00,E600 V200R008C00,S12700 with software V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S1700 with software V100R006C00, V100R007C00, V200R006C00,S2300 with software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C03, V100R006C05, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R005C01, V200R005C02, V200R005C03, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S2700 with software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C03, V100R006C05, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R005C01, V200R005C02, V200R005C03, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S5300 with software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C01, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S5700 with software V100R005C00, V100R006C00, V100R006C01, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S6300 with software V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R008C00,S6700 with software V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R003C02, V200R003C10, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S7700 with software V100R003C00, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R001C01, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,S9300 with software V100R001C00, V100R002C00, V100R003C00, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00, V200R008C10,S9700 with software V200R001C00, V200R002C00, V200R003C00, V200R005C00, V200R006C00, V200R007C00, V200R008C00,Secospace USG6600 V500R001C00SPC050 have a MaxAge LSA vulnerability due to improper OSPF implementation. When the device receives special LSA packets, the LS (Link Status) age would be set to MaxAge, 3600 seconds. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to poison the route table and launch a DoS attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10384 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, an assertion was potentially reachable in a WLAN driver ioctl. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10387 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, an assertion was potentially reachable in a handover scenario. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10391 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, the length in an HCI command is not properly checked for validity. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3152 | 1 Barco | 2 Clickshare Csc-1, Clickshare Csc-1 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Barco ClickShare CSC-1 devices with firmware before 01.09.03 allow remote attackers to obtain the root password by downloading and extracting the firmware image. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9879 | 3 Ibm, Redhat, Vmware | 4 Websphere Application Server, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Security before 3.2.10, 4.1.x before 4.1.4, and 4.2.x before 4.2.1. Spring Security does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with an encoded "/" to a request, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. The unexpected presence of path parameters can cause a constraint to be bypassed. Users of Apache Tomcat (all current versions) are not affected by this vulnerability since Tomcat follows the guidance previously provided by the Servlet Expert group and strips path parameters from the value returned by getContextPath(), getServletPath(), and getPathInfo(). Users of other Servlet containers based on Apache Tomcat may or may not be affected depending on whether or not the handling of path parameters has been modified. Users of IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x are known to be affected. Users of other containers that implement the Servlet specification may be affected. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9885 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Gemfire For Pivotal Cloud Foundry | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal GemFire for PCF 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.5 and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.1. The gfsh (Geode Shell) endpoint, used by operators and application developers to connect to their cluster, is unauthenticated and publicly accessible. Because HTTPS communications are terminated at the gorouter, communications from the gorouter to GemFire clusters are unencrypted. An attacker could run any command available on gfsh and could cause denial of service, lost confidentiality of data, escalate privileges, or eavesdrop on other communications between the gorouter and the cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10397 | 1 Php | 1 Php | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In PHP before 5.6.28 and 7.x before 7.0.13, incorrect handling of various URI components in the URL parser could be used by attackers to bypass hostname-specific URL checks, as demonstrated by evil.example.com:80#@good.example.com/ and evil.example.com:80?@good.example.com/ inputs to the parse_url function (implemented in the php_url_parse_ex function in ext/standard/url.c). | ||||
| CVE-2016-9932 | 1 Xen | 1 Xen | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CMPXCHG8B emulation in Xen 3.3.x through 4.7.x on x86 systems allows local HVM guest OS users to obtain sensitive information from host stack memory via a "supposedly-ignored" operand size prefix. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8146 | 1 Huawei | 4 P10, P10 Firmware, P10 Plus and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The call module of P10 and P10 Plus smartphones with software versions before VTR-AL00C00B167, versions before VTR-TL00C01B167, versions before VKY-AL00C00B167, versions before VKY-TL00C01B167 has a DoS vulnerability. An attacker may trick a user into installing a malicious application, and the application can send given parameter to call module to crash the call and data communication process. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8145 | 1 Huawei | 4 P10, P10 Firmware, P10 Plus and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The call module of P10 and P10 Plus smartphones with software versions before VTR-AL00C00B167, versions before VTR-TL00C01B167, versions before VKY-AL00C00B167, versions before VKY-TL00C01B167 has a DoS vulnerability. An attacker may trick a user into installing a malicious application, and the application can send given parameter to call module to crash the call and data communication process. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9939 | 2 Cryptopp, Debian | 2 Crypto\+\+, Debian Linux | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Crypto++ (aka cryptopp and libcrypto++) 5.6.4 contained a bug in its ASN.1 BER decoding routine. The library will allocate a memory block based on the length field of the ASN.1 object. If there is not enough content octets in the ASN.1 object, then the function will fail and the memory block will be zeroed even if its unused. There is a noticeable delay during the wipe for a large allocation. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9978 | 1 Ibm | 1 Curam Social Program Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Curam Social Program Management 5.2, 6.0, and 7.0 could allow an authenticated attacker to disclose sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 120254. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9955 | 2 Debian, Simplesamlphp | 2 Debian Linux, Simplesamlphp | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The SimpleSAML_XML_Validator class constructor in SimpleSAMLphp before 1.14.11 might allow remote attackers to spoof signatures on SAML 1 responses or possibly cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by leveraging improper conversion of return values to boolean. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9963 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Exim | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Exim | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Exim before 4.87.1 might allow remote attackers to obtain the private DKIM signing key via vectors related to log files and bounce messages. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9977 | 1 Ibm | 2 Maximo Asset Management, Maximo Asset Management Essentials | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.1, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to hijack a user's session, caused by the failure to invalidate an existing session identifier. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain access to another user's session. IBM X-Force ID: 120253. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9982 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information such as account lists due to improper access control. IBM X-Force ID: 120274. | ||||