Export limit exceeded: 416358 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 416358 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (416358 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-63286 | 1 Axis Communications Ab | 2 Axis Camera Station, Axis Camera Station Pro | 2026-10-28 | 7.1 High |
| Database backups are vulnerable to offline attacks. Backups created using a version prior to the patched version are still vulnerable. AXIS Camera Station Pro automatically creates one more such backup for recovery purpose when the update is applied. Delete all these backups and change the credentials stored in AXIS Camera Station Pro. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85655 | 2 Shortpixel, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Enable Media Replace, Enable Media Replace | 2026-10-28 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Enable Media Replace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.2. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to modify the post_content of any published post referencing the replaced media — including Administrator-owned posts — making changes immediately visible to unauthenticated visitors. The doReplaceQuery() method performs a database-wide search-and-replace across all posts containing the old media URL without any per-post capability check, meaning a single Author-triggered request can silently overwrite a large number of posts that WordPress's standard admin UI and REST API would otherwise forbid that user from editing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86395 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain Virtual Edition | 2026-10-28 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103313 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Bitpay Gateway For Woocommerce | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The BitPay Gateway for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 4.1.3 does not bind the payment provider's transaction confirmation to the order it completes, nor verify the confirmed amount, allowing an unauthenticated attacker who holds a single genuine low-value transaction to mark arbitrary higher-value orders as paid. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103330 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Sadad Qa Payment | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Sadad QA Payment WordPress plugin through 1.28 does not correctly verify the authenticity of incoming payment notifications, as the verification is keyed on a merchant secret that is empty by default and the rest of the signed data is attacker-controlled, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge a valid confirmation and mark orders as paid without payment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106648 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Royal Elementor Addons | 2026-10-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Royal Elementor Addons WordPress plugin before 1.7.1070 does not validate submitted form field values before substituting them into the recipient addresses of its form notification emails, allowing unauthenticated attackers to replace the recipient list and relay attacker-composed email from the site's own domain when a recipient field is configured to echo a submitted value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115223 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Smart Popup By Supsystic | 2026-10-28 | 4.9 Medium |
| The Smart Popup by Supsystic WordPress plugin before 2.0.2 does not prevent template-injection payloads from being stored in a popup text block and later evaluated by its template engine, because the filter meant to strip template delimiters runs before a decoding step that reconstructs them, allowing an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary template expressions server-side and read PHP constants such as the site's database credentials and authentication keys. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6064 | 1 Gen Digital | 3 Avast Antivirus, Avg Internet Security, Norton Antivirus | 2026-10-28 | 7.3 High |
| Link following vulnerability in Data Shredder components in Norton Antivirus, Avast Antivirus, and AVG Internet Security prior to 26.5.10933 on Windows allows a local, low-privileged attacker to escalate privileges to SYSTEM. During a privileged shred operation, enabling arbitrary file/folder deletion that is leveraged to gain NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM privelages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67074 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 9.1 Critical |
| HCL BigFix AEX is affected by a Remote Code Execution Vulnerability . It may allow attackers to execute code with the privileges of the affected application or service, potentially leading to unauthorized access, data exposure, or system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67073 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 8.6 High |
| HCL BigFix AEX is affected by an Unrestricted File Upload and Improper Access Control vulnerability. This could allow an attacker to upload malicious or unauthorized files and directly access or download sensitive uploaded content, potentially leading to information disclosure, unauthorized access, or system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67080 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| HCL BigFix AEX is affected by an Information Disclosure vulnerability due to improper handling of errors or exceptional conditions. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive technical information, including stack traces, system details, or internal paths, potentially facilitating further attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67079 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 6.4 Medium |
| HCL BigFix AEX is affected by a Clickjacking vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to embed the application within a malicious web page or iframe and trick users into performing unintended actions, potentially leading to unauthorized transactions or changes to their accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67077 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 4.2 Medium |
| HCL BigFix AEX is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to cause the application to send unauthorized requests to external resources. Successful exploitation could lead to access to unintended services, sensitive information disclosure, or unauthorized actions through the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21830 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Aex | 2026-10-28 | 3.7 Low |
| HCL BigFix AEX product is affected by a vulnerability in the aws-sdk package.. It may cause AWS API requests to be sent to unintended or non‐AWS endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115603 | 2 Advanced Ads Gmbh, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Advanced Ads – Tracking, Advanced Ads – Tracking | 2026-10-28 | 8.5 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Advanced Ads GmbH Advanced Ads – Tracking advanced-ads-tracking allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Advanced Ads – Tracking: from n/a before 4.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83525 | 1 Apache | 1 Kafka | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Incorrect operator (CWE-480) in the FetchSnapshot RPC handler in Apache Kafka from 2.8.0 before 4.2.2, and from 4.3.0 before 4.3.2 on all platforms allows an authenticated attacker with CLUSTER_ACTION privilege to cause a denial of service (controller process termination) via a crafted FetchSnapshotRequest with an empty topics array or a topic with no partitions. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.2.2, 4.3.2, or 4.4.0, which fix this issue. Users on unsupported branches (4.1.x and earlier) should upgrade to 4.2.2 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110952 | 1 Apache | 1 Kafka | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| A Kafka broker that authenticates clients with SASL/OAUTHBEARER using the bundled JWKS-backed validator always verifies the JWT signature, but two further checks are only performed when explicitly configured: - The issuer (iss) claim is verified only when sasl.oauthbearer.expected.issuer is set. When it is unset, a validly-signed token carrying the expected audience is accepted regardless of which issuer minted it. - An audience (aud) claim is required only when sasl.oauthbearer.expected.audience is set. When it is unset, a validly-signed token that omits the aud claim is accepted. (A token that carries an aud claim is still rejected when no expected audience is configured.) Both options default to unset and have been documented as optional (Importance LOW) since KIP-768 (3.1.0). Impact: The exposure is realizable mainly in deployments whose JWKS endpoint serves signing keys for more than one issuer (a multi-tenant identity provider, an aggregated/shared JWKS, or shared signing keys): a token minted for a different issuer, or a token lacking an audience, may be accepted to authenticate — potentially as a higher-privileged principal. In a single-issuer deployment where the provider controls the iss claim and issues audience-scoped tokens, exposure is limited. The signature trust anchor remains enforced in all cases. This is distinct from CVE-2026-33557 (acceptance of unsigned/unvalidated tokens); here the signature is validated and only the issuer/audience checks are not enforced by default. Mitigation (all affected versions, no upgrade required): Set both sasl.oauthbearer.expected.issuer (to your provider's exact iss value) and sasl.oauthbearer.expected.audience (to the audience(s) your brokers expect), per listener. Brokers that set these perform exact-match issuer/audience checks and are not affected. Both have been available since 3.1.0. Resolution: - From Apache Kafka 4.4.0: a broker configured with a JWKS endpoint fails to start unless both sasl.oauthbearer.expected.issuer and sasl.oauthbearer.expected.audience are set (secure by default). Deployments that intentionally do not restrict the issuer and/or audience may opt out per axis with sasl.oauthbearer.allow.unverified.issuer=true and/or sasl.oauthbearer.allow.unverified.audience=true. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110985 | 1 Apache | 1 Kafka | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| A Kafka broker using SASL/OAUTHBEARER with the default validator (sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class=DefaultJwtValidator) selects its implementation from configuration. When sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url is set, the validator verifies the JWT signature. When that URL is unset (the default) and no verification key resolver is supplied, DefaultJwtValidator silently falls back to ClientJwtValidator, which does not verify the JWT signature, algorithm, or issuer - and the broker starts with no warning or error. This is the residual of CVE-2026-33557, whose fix restored signature verification only on the path where the JWKS endpoint URL is set. Impact: A broker in this state accepts any structurally valid JWT, including "alg":"none" tokens. An unauthenticated remote attacker who can reach the listener can forge a token asserting any principal - including configured superusers - and gain full access to the cluster. Only brokers that enable SASL/OAUTHBEARER validation without a JWKS endpoint URL (and without a custom verification key resolver) are affected; brokers that set the URL verify signatures and are not affected. Unlike CVE-2026-110952 (issuer/audience not enforced by default), here no signature is verified at all. Mitigation (all affected versions, no upgrade required): Set sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url for every listener/mechanism that uses OAuthBearerValidatorCallbackHandler, or configure a signature-verifying sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class. Resolution: From Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.1, and 4.4.0: a broker that would fall back to the non-verifying ClientJwtValidator fails to start with a ConfigException instead of running without signature verification (secure by default). | ||||
| CVE-2026-111073 | 1 Apache | 1 Kafka | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| The broker-side PushTelemetry API (KIP-714) validates only the compressed size of a client's metrics payload against telemetry.max.bytes (default 1 MB) before decompressing it. ClientTelemetryUtils.decompress() then decompresses the payload with no limit on the decompressed output size, growing a heap buffer until the compressed input is exhausted. A small, highly compressible payload (for example gzip-compressed zeros) can therefore expand to hundreds of megabytes of broker heap. Impact: An authenticated client can send a PushTelemetry request with a small compressed payload that decompresses to a very large size, consuming broker heap out of proportion to the request size. Repeated or concurrent requests can exhaust the broker heap and cause an OutOfMemoryError, degrading or crashing the broker; a client that targets multiple brokers can affect cluster availability. PushTelemetry is available to any authenticated client and is not gated by an ACL. Mitigation: Upgrade to Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.1, or 4.4.0. On affected versions there is no configuration that fully prevents the amplification, because telemetry.max.bytes bounds only the compressed size; lowering telemetry.max.bytes reduces the worst-case decompressed size proportionally and is a partial mitigation. Resolution: - From Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.1, and 4.4.0: ClientTelemetryUtils.decompress() enforces a maximum decompressed size equal to telemetry.max.bytes (default 1 MB). Decompression reads in bounded chunks and aborts with a TelemetryTooLargeException once the decompressed total exceeds the limit, so an over-large or highly compressible payload is rejected instead of being fully expanded in heap. The decompressed size is therefore bounded by default. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111108 | 1 Apache | 1 Kafka | 2026-10-28 | N/A |
| Apache Kafka's code-generated protocol readers pre-size an array's collection from the element count declared by the sender. That count is checked only against the bytes remaining in the request buffer, which assumes about one byte per element; because most elements need several bytes, a request can declare far more elements than the buffer holds and still pass. For a keyed array the reader then allocates an ImplicitLinkedHashCollection of capacity (2 * count +1), so a request of a few tens of megabytes can force a heap allocation several times larger before any element is read. The pattern is emitted into every generated reader, so it affects all Kafka API types with an array field. Impact: Request parsing happens before any authorization check. On a listener that does not require authentication (for example PLAINTEXT), an unauthenticated attacker can send a few concurrent requests that each declare a very large= array length and allocate many times their wire size in broker heap, crashing the broker with an OutOfMemoryError. The reporter demonstrated three concurrent ~90 MB ProduceRequest (v3) connections exhausting a 1 GB heap (~8x amplification). On listeners that require authentication, the attacker needs valid credentials but no specific ACL, since parsing precedes authorization.. Mitigation: Upgrade to Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, or 4.4.0. Until then, lowering socket.request.max.bytes and restricting network access to broker listeners reduces, but does not remove, exposure. Resolution: From Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, and 4.4.0: generated readers cap the initial array pre-allocation at MessageUtil.MAX_PREALLOCATED_ARRAY_CAPACITY (1000) and grow it on demand, and reject a declared array length above MessageUtil.MAX_ARRAY_LENGTH (1,000,000). | ||||