Export limit exceeded: 16195 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16195 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-34971 | 1 Bytecodealliance | 1 Wasmtime | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. From 32.0.0 to before 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1, Wasmtime's Cranelift compilation backend contains a bug on aarch64 when performing a certain shape of heap accesses which means that the wrong address is accessed. When combined with explicit bounds checks a guest WebAssembly module this can create a situation where there are two diverging computations for the same address: one for the address to bounds-check and one for the address to load. This difference in address being operated on means that a guest module can pass a bounds check but then load a different address. Combined together this enables an arbitrary read/write primitive for guest WebAssembly when accesssing host memory. This is a sandbox escape as guests are able to read/write arbitrary host memory. This vulnerability has a few ingredients, all of which must be met, for this situation to occur and bypass the sandbox restrictions. This miscompiled shape of load only occurs on 64-bit WebAssembly linear memories, or when Config::wasm_memory64 is enabled. 32-bit WebAssembly is not affected. Spectre mitigations or signals-based-traps must be disabled. When spectre mitigations are enabled then the offending shape of load is not generated. When signals-based-traps are disabled then spectre mitigations are also automatically disabled. The specific bug in Cranelift is a miscompile of a load of the shape load(iadd(base, ishl(index, amt))) where amt is a constant. The amt value is masked incorrectly to test if it's a certain value, and this incorrect mask means that Cranelift can pattern-match this lowering rule during instruction selection erroneously, diverging from WebAssembly's and Cranelift's semantics. This incorrect lowering would, for example, load an address much further away than intended as the correct address's computation would have wrapped around to a smaller value insetad. This vulnerability is fixed in 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34987 | 1 Bytecodealliance | 1 Wasmtime | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. From 25.0.0 to before 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1, Wasmtime with its Winch (baseline) non-default compiler backend may allow properly constructed guest Wasm to access host memory outside of its linear-memory sandbox. This vulnerability requires use of the Winch compiler (-Ccompiler=winch). By default, Wasmtime uses its Cranelift backend, not Winch. With Winch, the same incorrect assumption is present in theory on both aarch64 and x86-64. The aarch64 case has an observed-working proof of concept, while the x86-64 case is theoretical and may not be reachable in practice. This Winch compiler bug can allow the Wasm guest to access memory before or after the linear-memory region, independently of whether pre- or post-guard regions are configured. The accessible range in the initial bug proof-of-concept is up to 32KiB before the start of memory, or ~4GiB after the start of memory, independently of the size of pre- or post-guard regions or the use of explicit or guard-region-based bounds checking. However, the underlying bug assumes a 32-bit memory offset stored in a 64-bit register has its upper bits cleared when it may not, and so closely related variants of the initial proof-of-concept may be able to access truly arbitrary memory in-process. This could result in a host process segmentation fault (DoS), an arbitrary data leak from the host process, or with a write, potentially an arbitrary RCE. This vulnerability is fixed in 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35195 | 1 Bytecodealliance | 1 Wasmtime | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. Prior to 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1, Wasmtime's implementation of transcoding strings between components contains a bug where the return value of a guest component's realloc is not validated before the host attempts to write through the pointer. This enables a guest to cause the host to write arbitrary transcoded string bytes to an arbitrary location up to 4GiB away from the base of linear memory. These writes on the host could hit unmapped memory or could corrupt host data structures depending on Wasmtime's configuration. Wasmtime by default reserves 4GiB of virtual memory for a guest's linear memory meaning that this bug will by default on hosts cause the host to hit unmapped memory and abort the process due to an unhandled fault. Wasmtime can be configured, however, to reserve less memory for a guest and to remove all guard pages, so some configurations of Wasmtime may lead to corruption of data outside of a guest's linear memory, such as host data structures or other guests's linear memories. This vulnerability is fixed in 24.0.7, 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45288 | 1 Freebsd | 1 Freebsd | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| A missing null-termination character in the last element of an nvlist array string can lead to writing outside the allocated buffer. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41237 | 1 Vmware | 3 Esxi, Fusion, Workstation | 2026-04-15 | 9.3 Critical |
| VMware ESXi, Workstation, and Fusion contain an integer-underflow in VMCI (Virtual Machine Communication Interface) that leads to an out-of-bounds write. A malicious actor with local administrative privileges on a virtual machine may exploit this issue to execute code as the virtual machine's VMX process running on the host. On ESXi, the exploitation is contained within the VMX sandbox whereas, on Workstation and Fusion, this may lead to code execution on the machine where Workstation or Fusion is installed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26403 | 1 Intel | 2 Xeon, Xeon Processors | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| Out-of-bounds write in the memory subsystem for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processors when using Intel(R) SGX or Intel(R) TDX may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32008 | 1 Intel | 1 Intel Amt And Intel Standard Manageability | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| Out-of-bounds write in the firmware for the Intel(R) AMT and Intel(R) Standard Manageability within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Network adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (low) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32022 | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 Medium | ||
| Finit provides fast init for Linux systems. Finit's urandom plugin has a heap buffer overwrite vulnerability at boot which leads to it overwriting other parts of the heap, possibly causing random instabilities and undefined behavior. The urandom plugin is enabled by default, so this bug affects everyone using Finit 4.2 or later that do not explicitly disable the plugin at build time. This bug is fixed in Finit 4.12. Those who cannot upgrade or backport the fix to urandom.c are strongly recommended to disable the plugin in the call to the `configure` script. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41413 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Fuji Electric Smart Editor is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds write, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43688 | 2 Openbsd, Vixie | 2 Openbsd, Cron | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| cron/entry.c in vixie cron before 9cc8ab1, as used in OpenBSD 7.4 and 7.5, allows a heap-based buffer underflow and memory corruption. NOTE: this issue was introduced during a May 2023 refactoring. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48499 | 1 Fujifilm | 8 Apeos 2150, Apeos 2350, Docuprint M115 W and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in FUJIFILM Business Innovation MFPs. A specially crafted IPP (Internet Printing Protocol) or LPD (Line Printer Daemon) packet may cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition on an affected MFP. Resetting the MFP is required to recover from the denial-of-service (DoS) condition. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11964 | 2 Microsoft, Tcpdump | 2 Windows, Libpcap | 2026-04-15 | 1.9 Low |
| On Windows only, if libpcap needs to convert a Windows error message to UTF-8 and the message includes characters that UTF-8 represents using 4 bytes, utf_16le_to_utf_8_truncated() can write data beyond the end of the provided buffer. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34105 | 1 Flexense | 1 Diskboss | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the built-in web interface of DiskBoss Enterprise versions 7.4.28, 7.5.12, and 8.2.14. The vulnerability arises from improper bounds checking on the path component of HTTP GET requests. By sending a specially crafted long URI, a remote unauthenticated attacker can trigger a buffer overflow, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM privileges on vulnerable Windows hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39840 | 1 Factorio | 1 Factorio | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Factorio before 1.1.101 allows a crafted server to execute arbitrary code on clients via a custom map that leverages the ability of certain Lua base module functions to execute bytecode and generate fake objects. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5943 | 1 Microdicom | 1 Dicom Viewer | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| MicroDicom DICOM Viewer suffers from an out-of-bounds write vulnerability. Remote attackers are able to exploit this issue to potentially execute arbitrary code on affected installations of DICOM Viewer. User interaction is required to exploit the vulnerability in that the user must either visit a malicious website or open a malicious DICOM file locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-35975 | 1 Microdicom | 1 Dicom Viewer | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| MicroDicom DICOM Viewer is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds write which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. The user must open a malicious DCM file for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24528 | 2 Mit, Redhat | 5 Kerberos 5, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.22 (with incremental propagation), there is an integer overflow for a large update size to resize() in kdb_log.c. An authenticated attacker can cause an out-of-bounds write and kadmind daemon crash. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45320 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in DocuPrint CP225w 01.22.01 and earlier, DocuPrint CP228w 01.22.01 and earlier, DocuPrint CM225fw 01.10.01 and earlier, and DocuPrint CM228fw 01.10.01 and earlier. If an affected MFP processes a specially crafted printer job file, a denial-of-service (DoS) condition may occur. | ||||
| CVE-2025-35971 | 2 Intel, Microsoft | 4 Proset, Proset/wireless, Proset/wireless Software and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| Out-of-bounds write for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi Software for Windows before version 23.160 within Ring 2: Device Drivers may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via adjacent access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (low) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5688 | 1 Amazon | 1 Freertos | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| We have identified a buffer overflow issue allowing out-of-bounds write when processing LLMNR or mDNS queries with very long DNS names. This issue only affects systems using Buffer Allocation Scheme 1 with LLMNR or mDNS enabled. Users should upgrade to the latest version and ensure any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes. | ||||