Export limit exceeded: 413848 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (206 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2012-3451 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 5 Cxf, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache CXF before 2.4.9, 2.5.x before 2.5.5, and 2.6.x before 2.6.2 allows remote attackers to execute unintended web-service operations by sending a header with a SOAP Action String that is inconsistent with the message body. | ||||
| CVE-2012-3370 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The SecurityAssociation.getCredential method in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 returns the credentials of the previous user when a security context is not provided, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges as other users. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1096 | 1 Redhat | 6 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The W3C XML Encryption Standard, as used in the JBoss Web Services (JBossWS) component in JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform before 5.2.2 and other products, when using block ciphers in cipher-block chaining (CBC) mode, allows remote attackers to obtain plaintext data via a chosen-ciphertext attack on SOAP responses, aka "character encoding pattern attack." | ||||
| CVE-2012-0874 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The (1) JMXInvokerHAServlet and (2) EJBInvokerHAServlet invoker servlets in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 do not require authentication by default in certain profiles, which might allow remote attackers to invoke MBean methods and execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this issue can only be exploited when the interceptor is not properly configured with a "second layer of authentication," or when used in conjunction with other vulnerabilities that bypass this second layer. | ||||
| CVE-2012-3369 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The CallerIdentityLoginModule in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 allows remote attackers to gain privileges of the previous user via a null password, which causes the previous user's password to be used. | ||||
| CVE-2012-2379 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 5 Cxf, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache CXF 2.4.x before 2.4.8, 2.5.x before 2.5.4, and 2.6.x before 2.6.1, when a Supporting Token specifies a child WS-SecurityPolicy 1.1 or 1.2 policy, does not properly ensure that an XML element is signed or encrypted, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2012-2377 | 1 Redhat | 6 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| JGroups diagnostics service in JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform before 5.2.2, SOA Platform before 5.3.0, and BRMS Platform before 5.3.0, is enabled without authentication when started by the JGroups channel, which allows remote attackers in adjacent networks to read diagnostics information via a crafted IP multicast. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5633 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 7 Cxf, Fuse Esb Enterprise, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security processing, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to SOAP services via an HTTP GET request. | ||||
| CVE-2011-5063 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check realm values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the availability of a protection space with weaker authentication or authorization requirements, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | ||||
| CVE-2011-5064 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| DigestAuthenticator.java in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 uses Catalina as the hard-coded server secret (aka private key), which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of this string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | ||||
| CVE-2011-5245 | 1 Redhat | 9 Jboss Bpms, Jboss Brms, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The readFrom function in providers.jaxb.JAXBXmlTypeProvider in RESTEasy before 2.3.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an external entity reference in a Java Architecture for XML Binding (JAXB) input, aka an XML external entity (XXE) injection attack, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2012-0818. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5629 | 1 Redhat | 6 Jboss Data Grid, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The default configuration of the (1) LdapLoginModule and (2) LdapExtLoginModule modules in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 4.3.0 CP10, 5.2.0, and 6.0.1, and Enterprise Web Platform (EWP) 5.2.0 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication via an empty password. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5575 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Cxf, Fuse Esb Enterprise, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 5 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache CXF 2.5.x before 2.5.10, 2.6.x before CXF 2.6.7, and 2.7.x before CXF 2.7.4 does not verify that a specified cryptographic algorithm is allowed by the WS-SecurityPolicy AlgorithmSuite definition before decrypting, which allows remote attackers to force CXF to use weaker cryptographic algorithms than intended and makes it easier to decrypt communications, aka "XML Encryption backwards compatibility attack." | ||||
| CVE-2012-5478 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The AuthorizationInterceptor in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 does not properly restrict access, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended role restrictions and perform arbitrary JMX operations via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0022 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 10 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 7 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.34, and 7.x before 7.0.23 uses an inefficient approach for handling parameters, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a request that contains many parameters and parameter values, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4858. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0034 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The NonManagedConnectionFactory in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 5.1.2 and 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) 5.1.2 and 5.2.0, and BRMS Platform before 5.3.1 logs the username and password in cleartext when an exception is thrown, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the log file. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0231 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Mina, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Handling of the close_notify SSL/TLS message does not lead to a connection closure, leading the server to retain the socket opened and to have the client potentially receive clear text messages afterward. Mitigation: 2.0.20 users should migrate to 2.0.21, 2.1.0 users should migrate to 2.1.1. This issue affects: Apache MINA. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 26 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 23 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 36 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 33 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||