Search Results (1948 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-54143 1 Openwrt 1 Asu 2026-04-15 N/A
openwrt/asu is an image on demand server for OpenWrt based distributions. The request hashing mechanism truncates SHA-256 hashes to only 12 characters. This significantly reduces entropy, making it feasible for an attacker to generate collisions. By exploiting this, a previously built malicious image can be served in place of a legitimate one, allowing the attacker to "poison" the artifact cache and deliver compromised images to unsuspecting users. This can be combined with other attacks, such as a command injection in Imagebuilder that allows malicious users to inject arbitrary commands into the build process, resulting in the production of malicious firmware images signed with the legitimate build key. This has been patched with 920c8a1.
CVE-2024-47921 2026-04-15 8.4 High
Smadar SPS – CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
CVE-2024-41951 2026-04-15 4.4 Medium
Pheonix App is a Python application designed to streamline various tasks, from managing files to playing mini-games. The issue is that the map of encoding/decoding languages are visible in code. The Problem was patched in 0.2.4.
CVE-2024-38532 2026-04-15 7.1 High
The NXP Data Co-Processor (DCP) is a built-in hardware module for specific NXP SoCs¹ that implements a dedicated AES cryptographic engine for encryption/decryption operations. The dcp_tool reference implementation included in the repository selected the test key, regardless of its `-t` argument. This issue has been patched in commit 26a7.
CVE-2024-33849 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
ci solution CI-Out-of-Office Manager through 6.0.0.77 uses a Hard-coded Cryptographic Key.
CVE-2024-30407 2026-04-15 8.1 High
The Use of a Hard-coded Cryptographic Key vulnerability in Juniper Networks Juniper Cloud Native Router (JCNR) and containerized routing Protocol Deamon (cRPD) products allows an attacker to perform Person-in-the-Middle (PitM) attacks which results in complete compromise of the container. Due to hardcoded SSH host keys being present on the container, a PitM attacker can intercept SSH traffic without being detected.  This issue affects Juniper Networks JCNR: * All versions before 23.4. This issue affects Juniper Networks cRPD: * All versions before 23.4R1.
CVE-2024-26317 2026-04-15 6.1 Medium
In illumos illumos-gate 2024-02-15, an error occurs in the elliptic curve point addition algorithm that uses mixed Jacobian-affine coordinates, causing the algorithm to yield a result of POINT_AT_INFINITY when it should not. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this to interfere with a connection, resulting in an attacked party computing an incorrect shared secret.
CVE-2024-23589 2026-04-15 6.8 Medium
Due to outdated Hash algorithm, HCL Glovius Cloud could allow attackers to guess the input data using brute-force or dictionary attacks efficiently using modern hardware such as GPUs or ASICs
CVE-2024-23580 1 Hcl Software 1 Dryice Optibot Reset Station 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
HCL DRYiCE Optibot Reset Station is impacted by insecure encryption of One-Time Passwords (OTPs). This could allow an attacker with access to the database to recover some or all encrypted values.
CVE-2024-23579 1 Hcl Software 1 Dryice Optibot Reset Station 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
HCL DRYiCE Optibot Reset Station is impacted by insecure encryption of security questions. This could allow an attacker with access to the database to recover some or all encrypted values.
CVE-2024-21787 1 Bmra Software 1 Bmra Software 2026-04-15 6.4 Medium
Inadequate encryption strength for some BMRA software before version 22.08 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2024-21530 1 Cocoon 1 Cocoon 2026-04-15 4.5 Medium
Versions of the package cocoon before 0.4.0 are vulnerable to Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption when the encrypt, wrap, and dump functions are sequentially called. An attacker can generate the same ciphertext by creating a new encrypted message with the same cocoon object. **Note:** The issue does NOT affect objects created with Cocoon::new which utilizes ThreadRng.
CVE-2023-7003 1 Sciener 1 Ttlock App 2026-04-15 6.8 Medium
The AES key utilized in the pairing process between a lock using Sciener firmware and a wireless keypad is not unique, and can be reused to compromise other locks using the Sciener firmware.
CVE-2023-41928 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
The device is observed to accept deprecated TLS protocols, increasing the risk of cryptographic weaknesses.
CVE-2023-41927 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
The server supports at least one cipher suite which is on the NCSC-NL list of cipher suites to be phased out, increasing the risk of cryptographic weaknesses.
CVE-2026-5889 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more 2026-04-14 4.3 Medium
Cryptographic Flaw in PDFium in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed an attacker to read potentially sensitive information from encrypted PDFs via a brute-force attack. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
CVE-2026-29129 1 Apache 1 Tomcat 2026-04-14 7.5 High
Configured cipher preference order not preserved vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.16 through 11.0.18, from 10.1.51 through 10.1.52, from 9.0.114 through 9.0.115. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.20, 10.1.53 or 9.0.116, which fix the issue.
CVE-2025-13914 2 Juniper, Juniper Networks 2 Apstra, Apstra 2026-04-14 8.7 High
A Key Exchange without Entity Authentication vulnerability in the SSH implementation of Juniper Networks Apstra allows a unauthenticated, MITM attacker to impersonate managed devices. Due to insufficient SSH host key validation an attacker can perform a machine-in-the-middle attack on the SSH connections from Apstra to managed devices, enabling an attacker to impersonate a managed device and capture user credentials. This issue affects all versions of Apstra before 6.1.1.
CVE-2020-24588 9 Arista, Cisco, Debian and 6 more 351 C-100, C-100 Firmware, C-110 and 348 more 2026-04-14 3.5 Low
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802.11n), an adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets.
CVE-2026-33697 2 Ultraviolet, Ultravioletrs 2 Cocos Ai, Cocos 2026-04-13 7.5 High
Cocos AI is a confidential computing system for AI. The current implementation of attested TLS (aTLS) in CoCoS is vulnerable to a relay attack affecting all versions from v0.4.0 through v0.8.2. This vulnerability is present in both the AMD SEV-SNP and Intel TDX deployment targets supported by CoCoS. In the affected design, an attacker may be able to extract the ephemeral TLS private key used during the intra-handshake attestation. Because the attestation evidence is bound to the ephemeral key but not to the TLS channel, possession of that key is sufficient to relay or divert the attested TLS session. A client will accept the connection under false assumptions about the endpoint it is communicating with — the attestation report cannot distinguish the genuine attested service from the attacker's relay. This undermines the intended authentication guarantees of attested TLS. A successful attack may allow an attacker to impersonate an attested CoCoS service and access data or operations that the client intended to send only to the genuine attested endpoint. Exploitation requires the attacker to first extract the ephemeral TLS private key, which is possible through physical access to the server hardware, transient execution attacks, or side-channel attacks. Note that the aTLS implementation was fully redesigned in v0.7.0, but the redesign does not address this vulnerability. The relay attack weakness is architectural and affects all releases in the v0.4.0–v0.8.2 range. This vulnerability class was formally analyzed and demonstrated across multiple attested TLS implementations, including CoCoS, by researchers whose findings were disclosed to the IETF TLS Working Group. Formal verification was conducted using ProVerif. As of time of publication, there is no patch available. No complete workaround is available. The following hardening measures reduce but do not eliminate the risk: Keep TEE firmware and microcode up to date to reduce the key-extraction surface; define strict attestation policies that validate all available report fields, including firmware versions, TCB levels, and platform configuration registers; and/or enable mutual aTLS with CA-signed certificates where deployment architecture permits.