Export limit exceeded: 10233 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (3904 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-2254 | 1 Apache | 2 Org.apache.sling.servlets.post, Sling | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The deepGetOrCreateNode function in impl/operations/AbstractCreateOperation.java in org.apache.sling.servlets.post.bundle 2.2.0 and 2.3.0 in Apache Sling does not properly handle a NULL value that returned when the session does not have permissions to the root node, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1783 | 6 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 3 more | 6 Subversion, Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The mod_dav_svn module for the Apache HTTP Server, as distributed in Apache Subversion 1.5.x and 1.6.x before 1.6.17, when the SVNPathAuthz short_circuit option is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and memory consumption) in opportunistic circumstances by requesting data. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2250 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Open For Business Project (aka OFBiz) 10.04.01 through 10.04.05, 11.04.01 through 11.04.02, and 12.04.01 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Unified Expression Language (UEL) functions via JUEL metacharacters in unspecified parameters, related to nested expressions. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1772 | 2 Apache, Opensymphony | 3 Struts, Webwork, Xwork | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in XWork in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.2.3, and OpenSymphony XWork in OpenSymphony WebWork, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving (1) an action name, (2) the action attribute of an s:submit element, or (3) the method attribute of an s:submit element. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1752 | 6 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 3 more | 6 Subversion, Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The mod_dav_svn module for the Apache HTTP Server, as distributed in Apache Subversion before 1.6.17, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a request for a baselined WebDAV resource, as exploited in the wild in May 2011. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2249 | 1 Apache | 1 Http Server | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| mod_session_dbd.c in the mod_session_dbd module in the Apache HTTP Server before 2.4.5 proceeds with save operations for a session without considering the dirty flag and the requirement for a new session ID, which has unspecified impact and remote attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1582 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.12 and 7.0.13 processes the first request to a servlet without following security constraints that have been configured through annotations, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1088, CVE-2011-1183, and CVE-2011-1419. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1498 | 1 Apache | 1 Httpclient | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache HttpClient 4.x before 4.1.1 in Apache HttpComponents, when used with an authenticating proxy server, sends the Proxy-Authorization header to the origin server, which allows remote web servers to obtain sensitive information by logging this header. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1475 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP BIO connector in Apache Tomcat 7.0.x before 7.0.12 does not properly handle HTTP pipelining, which allows remote attackers to read responses intended for other clients in opportunistic circumstances by examining the application data in HTTP packets, related to "a mix-up of responses for requests from different users." | ||||
| CVE-2011-1419 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.11, when web.xml has no security constraints, does not follow ServletSecurity annotations, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests to a web application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1088. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2248 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple open redirect vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15 allow remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in a parameter using the (1) redirect: or (2) redirectAction: prefix. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1184 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not have the expected countermeasures against replay attacks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests, related to lack of checking of nonce (aka server nonce) and nc (aka nonce-count or client nonce count) values. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2210 | 1 Apache | 1 Xml Security For C\+\+ | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the XML Signature Reference functionality in Apache Santuario XML Security for C++ (aka xml-security-c) before 1.7.2 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via malformed XPointer expressions. NOTE: this is due to an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-2154. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1183 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.11, when web.xml has no login configuration, does not follow security constraints, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests to a meta-data complete web application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-1088 and CVE-2011-1419. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1176 | 3 Apache, Debian, Mpm-itk Project | 3 Http Server, Debian Linux, Mpm-itk | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The configuration merger in itk.c in the Steinar H. Gunderson mpm-itk Multi-Processing Module 2.2.11-01 and 2.2.11-02 for the Apache HTTP Server does not properly handle certain configuration sections that specify NiceValue but not AssignUserID, which might allow remote attackers to gain privileges by leveraging the root uid and root gid of an mpm-itk process. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1088 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.10 does not follow ServletSecurity annotations, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests to a web application. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1077 | 1 Apache | 1 Archiva | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Archiva 1.0 through 1.2.2, and 1.3.x before 1.3.5, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2192 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Hadoop, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The RPC protocol implementation in Apache Hadoop 2.x before 2.0.6-alpha, 0.23.x before 0.23.9, and 1.x before 1.2.1, when the Kerberos security features are enabled, allows man-in-the-middle attackers to disable bidirectional authentication and obtain sensitive information by forcing a downgrade to simple authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2189 | 1 Apache | 1 Openoffice | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache OpenOffice.org (OOo) before 4.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via invalid PLCF data in a DOC document file. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2185 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Tomcat, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The readObject method in the DiskFileItem class in Apache Tomcat and JBoss Web, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0 and Red Hat JBoss Portal 6.0.0, allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance, a similar issue to CVE-2013-2186. NOTE: this issue is reportedly disputed by the Apache Tomcat team, although Red Hat considers it a vulnerability. The dispute appears to regard whether it is the responsibility of applications to avoid providing untrusted data to be deserialized, or whether this class should inherently protect against this issue | ||||